A configuração da Justiça

Abstract

Estudos e pesquisas sobre uma grande variedade de conexões literário-linguísticas da lei e sobre as ciências humanas aumentaram enormemente o escopo da teoria legal nas últimas décadas. Entretanto, neste artigo defendo a união de teoria e prática no direito e jurisprudência quando nos voltamos para as ciências humanas para nossos empreendimentos interdisciplinares, na visão de que a ideia (1) original dos estudos jurídico-literários era ajudar a nutrir o professional do direito. Isto é especialmente emergente porque, pelo menos para mim, é através da lei na prática que podemos aprender a falar de justiça. Então, a questão quid-juris que está no coração da doutrina do direito e da jurisprudência tradicionalmente concebida, permanence importante quando se investiga as possibilidades da contribuição das ciências humanas no plano metodológico. Em outras palavras, enquanto discutimos questões de justiça de forma abstrata, somente na maneira pela qual questões legais reais são resolvidas que podemos decidir que a justiça esteja sendo feita. Não podemos, então, pensar na justiça sem a lei na prática, porque significado legal e justiça são os produtos de discussões sobre como estabelecer relações sociais e legais concretas. Isto chama a  atenção de  como a lei é e pode ser feita. Meu objetivo é me voltar às hermeneuticas filosóficas continental-europeias, especialmente como desenvolvidas por Paul Ricoeur, muito ricas nas questões de metáforas, sabedoria prática e o que é justo, para desenvolver meu argumento principal e oferecer sugestões para Law and Literature in practice através das lentes do studia humanitis.

Referências bibliográficas:

Abbott, Andrew: The System of Professions, an essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 1988. 

Aristotle: The Poetics. Translated by W. Hamilton Fyfe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) and London 1965 [1927]. 

Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by H. Rackham and edited by J. Henderson. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) and London 2003 [1926]. 

Aristotle: The Rhetoric. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1924. Available on  <http://rhetoric.eserver.org/aristotle> (visited 10 January 2012). 

Aristotle: The Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett [1895]. Internet Classics Archive. Available on  <http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.html> 2009 (visited 13 January 2012). 

Barfield, Owen: Poetic Diction, a Study in Meaning. Wesleyan University Press, Hanover (New Hampshire) 1984 [1928]. 

Barfield, Owen: ‘Poetic Diction and Legal Fiction’. In Owen Barfield: The Rediscovery of Meaning and other essays, Wesleyan University Press, Hanover (New Hampshire) 1977, 44-64. 

Biet, Christian: ‘L’empire du droit, les jeux de la littérature’. Europe, revue littéraire mensuelle (2002) 7-22. 

Bruner, Jerome: Making Stories, law, literature, life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) 2002. 

Coleridge, Samuel Taylor: The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, vol.1. Biographia Literaria. Edited by J. Engell and W. Jackson Bate. Princeton University Press, Princeton 1983. 

Cover, Robert: ‘Violence and the Word’.  95 (1) Yale Law Journal (1986) 1601-1629. 

Dworkin, Ronald: Justice in Robes. Belknap Press, Cambridge (Mass.) and London 2006.

Eden, Kathy: Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition. Princeton University Press, Princeton 1986.

Engisch, Karl: Logische Studien zur Gesetzanwendung. Winter, Heidelberg 1963 [1943].

Fludernik, Monika and Greta Olson:  ‘Introduction’. In Greta Olson (ed.): Current Trends in Narratology, De Gruyter, Berlin 2011, 1-33.

Frank, Arthur W.: Letting Stories Breathe, a socio-narratology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2010.

Fricker, Miranda: Epistemic Injustice, Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007.

Gaakeer, Jeanne: ‘(Con)temporary Law’. 11 (1) European Journal of English Studies (2007) 29-46.

Gaakeer, Jeanne: ‘Law in Context: Law, Equity, and the Realm of Human Affairs’. In Daniela Carpi (ed.): Practising Equity, Addressing Law, Equity in Law and Literature, Winter, Heidelberg 2008, 33-70.

Gaakeer, Jeanne: ‘The Legal Hermeneutics of Suffering’. 3 (2) Law and Humanities (2009) 123-149.

Gaakeer, Jeanne: ‘The Future of Literary-Legal Jurisprudence: Mere Theory or Just Practice?’. 5 (1) Law and Humanities (2011) 185-196.

Gaakeer, Jeanne: ‘ “On the Study Methods of our Time”: methodologies of Law and Literature in the context of interdisciplinary studies’. In Priska Gisler, Sara Steinert Borella and Caroline Wiedmer (eds): Intersections of Law and Culture, Palgrave MacMillan, 2012 a, pp.20-44.

Gaakeer, Jeanne: ‘European Law and Literature: Forever Young. The Nomad Concurs’. In Helle Porsdam (ed.): Dialogues on Justice: European Perspectives on Law and Humanities, De Gruyter, Berlin 2012 b, 44-72.

Holdheim, Wolfgang W.: Der Justizirrtum als literarische Problematik.  De Gruyter,  Berlin 1969.

Kronman, Anthony T.: The Lost Lawyer, failing ideals of the legal profession, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) 1993.

Larenz, Karl F.:  Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft. Springer, Berlin, 1991[1960].

Mootz, Francis J. III: ‘Foreword’ to the Symposium on Philosophical Hermeneutics and Critical Legal Theory. 76 (2) Chicago-Kent Law Review (2000) 719-730. 

Olson, Greta: ‘De-AmericanizingLaw-and-Literature Narratives: Opening up the Story’. 22 (1) Law & Literature (2010) 338-364. 

Pavlakos, George and Sean Coyle: ‘Introduction’. In Sean Coyle and George Pavlakos (eds): Jurisprudence or Legal Science? A Debate about the Nature of Legal Theory.Hart, Oxford and Portland (Oregon) 2005, 1-13. 

Porsdam, Helle: From Civil to Human Rights, Dialogues on Law and Humanities in the United States and Europe. Edward Elgar, Northampton 2009. 

Posner, Richard A., How Judges Think. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.) and London 2008. 

Ricoeur, Paul: ‘The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling’. Critical Inquiry (1978) 143-159. 

Ricoeur, Paul: ‘Narrative Time’. Critical Inquiry (1980)167-190. 

Ricoeur, Paul: ‘Life: A Story in Search of a Narrator’. Translated by J.N. Kraay and A.J. Scholten. In M.C. Doeser and J.N. Kraay (eds): Facts and Values, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1987, 121-132. 

Ricoeur, Paul: Time and Narrative. Translated by Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, volume 1, 1984; volume 2, 1985, volume 3, 1988.  

Ricoeur, Paul: Oneself as Another. Translated by Kathleen Blamey. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 1992. 

Ricoeur, Paul: The Rule of Metaphor, multi-disciplinary studies in the creation of meaning in language. Translated by Robert Czerny with Kathleen Mclaughlin and John Costello, Routledge, London 1986 [1975]. 

Ricoeur, Paul: ‘Imagination in Discourse and in Action’. In Ricoeur, Paul:  From Text to Action, essays in hermeneutics, II. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson. Northwestern University Press. Evanston (Ill.) 1991. 

Ricoeur, Paul: The Just. Translated by David Pellauer.  University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 2000. 

Ricoeur, Paul: ‘Multiple Étrangeté’. In H.J. Adriaanse and R. Enskat (eds): Fremdheit und Vertrautheit, Hermeneutik im europäischen Kontext, Peeters, Leuven 2000, 11-23. 

Ricoeur, Paul: Le juste, la justice et son échec.  L’Herne, Paris 2005. 

Ricoeur, Paul: Reflections on the Just. Translated by David Pellauer. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 2007. 

Ricoeur, Paul: Amour et Justice. Editions Points, Villeneuve-D’Ascq 2008. 

Roberts, John G. jr: ‘Speech at the US Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference’, June 2011. Available on <www.abajournal.com/news/article/law_prof_responds> and <www.acslaw.org> (visited 25 November 2011). 

Schön, Donald A.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York 1983. 

White, James Boyd: The Legal Imagination, Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression. Little, Brown and Co., Boston 1973.